Acker, J. R. (2020). Adrift in the interstices of law and justice: Divining the right and wrong in the sad, strange case of People v. Schmidt. Albany Law Review. Forthcoming.

Acker, J. R. & Wu, S. (2020). “I did it, but…I didn’t”: When rejected affirmative defenses produce wrongful convictions. Nebraska Law Review. Forthcoming.

Allen, J. M. (2009). Free for all a free for all: The Supreme Court’s abdication of duty in failing to establish standards for indigent defense. Law & Inequality, 27, 365-411.

American Bar Association Criminal Justice Section (2006).  Achieving justice: Freeing the innocent, convicting the guilty. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.

Armstrong, K. (2014, December 10).  What can you do with a drunken lawyer?  The Marshall Project.  Retrieved from

Bailey, C. (2002). Ake v. Oklahoma and an indigent defendant’s “right” to an expert witness: A promise denied or imagined? William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 10, 401-458.

Berry, S. M. (2003). ‘Bad lawyering:’ How defense attorneys help convict the innocent. Northern Kentucky University Law Review, 30, 487. 

Buskey, B. & Lucas, L. S. (2017). Keeping Gideon’s promise: Using equal protection to address the denial of counsel in misdemeanor cases. Fordham Law Review, 85, 2299-2339.

Clapman, A. (2011). Petty offenses, drastic consequences: Toward a sixth amendment right to counsel for noncitizen defendants facing deportation. Cardozo Law Review, 33, 585-618).

Davies, A. L. B. (2014/2015).  How do we “do data” in public defense?  Albany Law Review, 78.3, 1179-1192.

Dripps, D. A. (2012). Up from Gideon. Texas Tech Law Review, 45, 113-132.

Freedman, M. H. (2013).  Why it’s essential to represent “those people.”  In A. Smith & M. H. Freedman (Eds.), How can you represent those people?  New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Giannelli, P. C. (2004). Ake v. Oklahoma: The right to expert assistance in a post-Daubert, post-DNA world. Cornell Law Review, 89, 1305=1419.

Gilbert, L. (2013). Sharpening the tools of an adequate defense: providing for the appointment of experts for indigent defendants in child death cases under Ake v. Oklahoma. San Diego Law Review, 50, 469-515.

Givelber, D., & Farrell, A. (2008). Judges and juries: The defense case and differences in acquittal rates. Law & Social Inquiry, 33(1), 31-52.

Greeley, T. J. (2011). The plight of indigent defendants in a computer-based age: Maintaining the adversarial system by granting indigent defendants access to computer experts. Virginia Journal of Law & Technology, 16, 400-429.

Groendyke, E. (2007). Ake v. Oklahoma: Proposals for making the right a reality. New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 10, 367-393.

Hashimoto, E. (2016). Motivating constitutional compliance. Florida Law Review, 68, 1001-1042.

Hashimoto, E. J. (2007). The price of misdemeanor representation. William & Mary Law Review, 49, 461-513.

King, J. D. (2013). Beyond “Life and Liberty”: The evolving right to counsel. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 48, 1-49.

King, N. J. (2014). Judicial review: Appeals and postconviction proceedings. In Redlich, A. R., Acker, J. R., Norris, R. J. & Bonventre, C. L., eds. Examining wrongful convictions: Stepping back, moving forward. Pp. 217-236. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

Miller, C. (2008). Ordeal by innocence: Why there should be a wrongful incarceration/execution exception to attorney-client confidentiality. Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, 102, 391-405.

National Right to Counsel Committee (2009).  Justice denied: America’s Continuing Neglect of our constitutional right to counsel.  Retrieved from

Roberts, J. (2011). Why misdemeanors matter: Defining effective advocacy in the lower criminal courts. U.C. Davis Law Review, 45, 277-372.

Smith, A. & Freedman, M. H. (2013).  How can you represent those people? (Eds.).  New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Smith, S. F. (2009). Taking Strickland claims seriously. Marquette Law Review, 93, 515-544.

West, E. M. (2010).  Court findings of ineffective assistance of counsel claims in post-conviction appeals among the first 255 DNA exoneration cases.  Retrieved from

Worden, A. P., Davies, A. L. B., & Brown, E. K. (2011). A patchwork of policies: Justice, due process, and public defense across American states. Albany Law Review, 74, 1423.

Worden, A. P., Davies, A. L. B., & Brown, E. K. (2014).  Public defense in an age of innocence: The innocence paradigm and the challenges of representing the accused.  In M. Zalman & J. Carrano (Eds.), Wrongful convictions and criminal justice reform: Making justice (209-225).  New York, NY: Routledge.

Yaroshefsky, E. & Schaefer, L. (2014).  Defense lawyering and wrongful convictions.  In A. D. Redlich, J. R. Acker, R. J. Norris, & C. L. Bonventre (Eds.), Examining wrongful convictions: Stepping back, moving forward (123-140).  Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press.